|
|
 | | Re: New Groups added to LUGMAP development page...
|
| Hey Eric, Could you link TennLUG to it's website, (URL) ? Scott Member 718 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.org)
| | | | | New Groups added to LUGMAP development page...
|
| Followups to lugnet.org I have updated the LUGMAP development page with the following LUGs and LTCs. AdeLUG - Australia BUGS - Australia MUGS - Australia TasLUG - Australia PLUG - Portugal LUCNY - United States IndyLUG - United States NILTC - United (...) (24 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.org, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.ca, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.org.us.lucny
|
| (...) crossposted and FUT admin.general You might try sending Todd and/or Suzanne a note directly, or just posting to admin.general (hence my crosspost). I think IndyLUG is also at the point where there was talk of getting a newsgroup although I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.org, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | lugnet.org.us.lucny
|
| Could we please get a newsgroup- lugnet.org.us.lucny ? We have a site, and a good member list. We have asked before, as well. Thank you very much, Dave (24 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: GATS
|
| (...) See lugnet.org.us.michlug or the MichLUG website at www.michlug.org for details of this particular GATS show, which was held in Grand Rapids MI weekend before last. However GATS (Great American Train Shows) is a company that puts on a train (...) (24 years ago, 2-Aug-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.town, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) We don't. In fact, rtlToronto proper is really just Chris and I making some very high level decisions, based on what people tell us, usually at dinners and events. Inevitably that power is vested in us because a) we've taken the initiative and (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) As I've said, that appropriateness is not a viewpoint I share with you. I think there IS value in the free flow of ideas and discussion, in both directions. But if rtlToronto as a group feels that non club members shouldn't post in the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) I believe the two are directly interwoven. I'm proud of my group because of its number of posts, which directly reflect the progress of development in our events. When the post count goes up it’s not cause we simply enjoy the conversation, but (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) Are you proud of our group or the number of posts? From the messages you were sending, I got the impression that you were more interested in having the most posts and not what the group was doing. I still wouldn't call them stupid, but I found (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) Not at all. I'm glad you are proud of it, as am I. However, the approach to this I question. I also suggest you to be proud of a different metric other than posts--instead, how many events we've run, people we've informed and (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) LOL…Too funny, I didn’t think you’d pick up on that. O.K. fine so ‘Progress Report” would be a bit of a stretch! -R (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) I thank you for your honesty and I respect your opinion. Fine, “at best silly, or annoying, or at worst result in the degredation of quality” simple criticism and a disagreement is totally fine, but, don’t insult me with the word stupid. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) Right...and as a .org group, it SHOULD be up to them to poilce themselves...but perhaps not in public, and not so vehemently, in my mind. (...) Jesse Alan Long Syndrome. <little snip> (...) Yep...it's all about tolerable lines...Calum's seems (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) My take on it is that it's "ok" up to a point. Obviously, once a group is dominated by left-field remarks, it's no longer relevant and should be moved elsewhere. The other danger of having lots of these remarks being that people may stop (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| Ah...I see this has made it's way into .general...I can chime in... If Richard's little toung-in-cheek ribbing of the high-volume groups is unwelcome, then so too must be any obiquitous post from left-field. I mean, really, I spent time typing Monty (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) Exactly! Remember, anyone can say WHAT they want, WHEN they want, and HOW they want. As long as it’s within the bounds of the TOS agreement and doesn’t anger the great almighty Todd it’s cool. I think most of us are intelligent to realize that (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| (...) I do when those posts are nothing but filled with periods. I agree with Eric, they incite others to randomly post as well. (...) It certainly does reflect on the group. As it relates rtlToronto as a group to other groups in terms of posts. (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| <snip> (...) Richard, Take it easy. Just so you know the posts did look like rtlToronto was trying to start a competition with NELUG. That may not be how you meant them but that is how I perceived them. You might also not be aware that many people (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away? [[Freedoms]]
|
| Calum Tsang wrote: “Actually, it's no one in rtlToronto really, it's Richard doing his own thing, for whatever stupid reasons. On behalf of rtlToronto as an organization, I apologize, it's not us in any formal capacity.” (...) Really, I'm sorry you (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 30 posts away?
|
| To All, (...) It isn't our fault we just have so much to talk about! ; ) Really, it is just from GATS, that rtltoronto group up there (We love you folks, just a mild jest in the spirit of international competition!). The forum is a good place to get (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us.michlug, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
|
