 | | Re: Foo is Moo —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) You dare to challenge His Exaltedness? You overstep your place, for only Loyal Subjects can properly mock the infernal silliness of the Mind of Mango. To you and your bovine minions, I say... "you goin' down, foo..." and if you ask "in what (...) (21 years ago, 21-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Foo is Moo —Ivan Louch
|
| | | | (...) Funny post or *not*, I must (as the Alpha Bovine) point out that the referenced post is off topic for the thread since it did not contain any comments about the upcoming rtlToronto robotics challenge. You also might want to invest in this fine (...) (21 years ago, 21-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Foo is Moo —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Are you sure you're not the biggest animal of an entirely different sort? (either feline or equine... you do the substitutions and see what you come up with) (...) You are not the thread content arbiter here, I am. This is the second time you (...) (21 years ago, 21-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Foo is Moo —Ivan Louch
|
| | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HLL5uy.10zt@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) don't)..). (...) think (...) for (...) you're (...) thread (...) Do I *REALLY* have to post everything TWICE for you? Geez! (...) (21 years ago, 21-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Foo is Moo —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Nope. Twice is too many. Heck, for most of what you say, even *once* is too many... How about if we go with "don't post at all"??? I'm lookin' in the header, I ain't seein' no changes... I'm thinkin' you're all talk, and not very funny talk at (...) (21 years ago, 21-Sep-03, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
|
| | | | |
