 | | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Does anyone fuel that these puns are getting annoying? Ummm, G, we'd better stop! --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) I'd better vacuum, then. --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) We'd have to be fuels to try. James (URL) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Gah. Your capacity for a dirty pun has overwhelmed me. You might say I've been swept away... James (URL) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Dag-burnit, is there no escape from this crazy atmosphere of punnery? --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Do you really 'speck us to believe that? -LFB (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Well, you might be able to steer out of the way dust in time. --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Theoretically, they could approach the speed of light, but I wouldn't want to hit a dust particle at that speed! (Not to mention that you would have to convert conventional matter into a more basic type of particle in order to go that fast. Of (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Sometimes they just escape by themselves. --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Ouch! Careful how you toss those puns around, some of us have negative reaction to the things. James (URL) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
|
(...) Wow, if you could get there that cheaply, then I suppose the speed wouldn't matter. --Todd (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) Those polar bears are female! I*nu*it! I think the female polar bears are the bigger, meaner ones anyhow (can anyone confirm this?)--but with all that hair, I think that on the brick itself the differences would be bearly visible. ABS doesn't (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) What can I say? I have an eye for detail. Sometimes, as in this case, I wish I didn't. :) (...) I'm printing this out and putting it in a rocket destined for Mars... Jeff (26 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) "Stud-less", eh? I didn't know you could tell their gender from the pictures! Oh, the places this could go.... DaveE (26 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Wither lugnet.cad.leocad?
|
|
Re the subject... Technically, c/wither/whither/ unless you are saying the group has withered away... :-) I'm such a pain, sometimes. But not a pain in the withers, it's a bit more central. (repost to fix followup) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 SW Lego
|
|
(...) without them... (...) I were (...) canard is (...) This fowl exchange already has swan response too many, and I'm not going to suffer this mallard-y any further un-teal someone puts a stop to it! Dave! (please forgive me if this got posted (...) (26 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 SW Lego
|
|
(...) I think you should have given up the goose at this point. I wood duck out if I were you. You're just drake-ing this out, and so am I, since the meaning of canard is migrating... LFB (26 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 SW Lego
|
|
(...) Uff-da. "pan-am-ties"? LOL -John (...) (26 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
