Subject:
|
Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.pun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 19:37:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
608 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.pun, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.general, Jeff Stembel writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Paul Davidson writes:
> > > Does anyone have better scans of the Arctic polar bears in the 2000
> > > catalogue? I'm interested in knowing if they have studs on their backs --
> > > from the Brickshelf scans, it looks like they don't. That would be quite a
> > > letdown for me -- I had plans for domesticating those polar bears! Even the
> > > dragons and alligators have studs, so why not polar bears? (assuming that's
> > > the case)
> >
> > I'll see if I can scan one in this weekend, but I can confirm that they are
> > stud-less. On the upside, the head moves. :)
> >
> > Jeff
>
> "Stud-less", eh? I didn't know you could tell their gender from the pictures!
What can I say? I have an eye for detail. Sometimes, as in this case, I wish
I didn't. :)
> Oh, the places this could go....
I'm printing this out and putting it in a rocket destined for Mars...
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
| (...) Those polar bears are female! I*nu*it! I think the female polar bears are the bigger, meaner ones anyhow (can anyone confirm this?)--but with all that hair, I think that on the brick itself the differences would be bearly visible. ABS doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
