Puns & Punning : 329

Off-Topic / Pun / 329

328 | 330

Subject:	Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.pun
Date:	Thu, 2 Dec 1999 19:15:51 GMT
Viewed:	1883 times

In lugnet.general, Jeff Stembel writes: > In lugnet.general, Paul Davidson writes: > > Does anyone have better scans of the Arctic polar bears in the 2000 > > catalogue? I'm interested in knowing if they have studs on their backs -- > > from the Brickshelf scans, it looks like they don't. That would be quite a > > letdown for me -- I had plans for domesticating those polar bears! Even the > > dragons and alligators have studs, so why not polar bears? (assuming that's > > the case) > > I'll see if I can scan one in this weekend, but I can confirm that they are > stud-less. On the upside, the head moves. :) > > Jeff "Stud-less", eh? I didn't know you could tell their gender from the pictures! Oh, the places this could go.... DaveE

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
(...) What can I say? I have an eye for detail. Sometimes, as in this case, I wish I didn't. :) (...) I'm printing this out and putting it in a rocket destined for Mars... Jeff (27 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
(...) I'll see if I can scan one in this weekend, but I can confirm that they are stud-less. On the upside, the head moves. :) Jeff (27 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)

11 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact