 | | Re: spamcake collection
|
| (...) <FEzKnJ.F9n@lugnet.com> (...) What about a footnote? I've used those too. Usually they are formatted, "(1) foo blah glorp". (...) download (...) I'm (...) Forget my pandering. Doesn't have to be free. (...) That would work. (...) I don't do (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: spamcake collection
|
| <FEzILx.C5I@lugnet.com> <378FB99F.F46CAB87@io.com> <FEzKnJ.F9n@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Hardly any at all with the latest incantation. (1) (...) This is basically my strategy. I'm (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: spamcake collection
|
| (...) Writing (...) part (...) and (...) <snipped code> How much? too much to throw out manually? Hmm (with an empty stare). Consider that spamcake directives never have parentheses surrounding them (but I've put some parenthetical lines after my (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: spamcake collection
|
| (...) If Perl is the code of refreshment, swig on! :-, I'm not sure this will get all of them. It does introduce some non-sig text. BREAKAGE: while( $lineIn = <STDIN> ) { if( $lineIn =~ m/\bTom McD\b/ ) { while( $msgIn = <STDIN> ) { if( $msgIn =~ (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: spamcake collection
|
| (...) of (...) You'll need a swig while doing it ;-) (...) Thanks! My mailbox is too full of junk to hold it so an ftp worked out great. (...) -Tom McD. when replying, stay away from the *pure* spamcake stuff... (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | spamcake collection
|
| (...) Here's the file -- ftp://ftp.lugnet.com...g/spamcake (Note: This isn't necessarily only spamcake stuff -- it's anything that matched "^From:.*Tom McDonald", which may be a slight superset of pure spamcake stuff.) --Todd (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| (...) Todd, Can you fling a copy my way as well? I'll take a swig at it... Cheers, - jsproat (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| (...) Please! That would be great! I've already started, just in case you happen to look at an activity log and utter, "Holy spamcake!" (or the equivalent :-) -Tom McD. (who's patiently awaiting a URL) when replying, note that this spamcake (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| (...) Tom/Mark... I've got a 1.3 MB file here of all Tom's postings... Writing a harvester to parse all the sentences and figure out exactly what's part of Tom's sig and what's an official spamcake thingy is the tricky bit -- and I'll let you do (...) (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Uber-Galic question
|
| (...) If you put in the text "+spamcake +tom +mcdonald" instead of "spamcake" it'll reduce the set of things returned somewhat (in this case 7, I think :) --Todd (27 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
|
