Subject:
|
Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 16:25:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
312 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, James Powell wrote:
> (oh, I would argue with Larry about the easiest way -right now- to get a 1G
> acceleration out of earth's atmosphere/fallout range...use a Nuclear rocket, a
> la the USAF experiments...Not good in Atomosphere, but not a whit of difference
> in space.)
Care to expand on these "USAF experiments"? Got links?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
| (...) (URL) some information on the subject in question. apparently it is not all that bad even in atm, but 250 K lbs thrust is not all that much when launching large objects, especially from a 15-20K lb + fuel motor. (It's the burn times that are (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
| (...) Actually, you can make them burn at almost any rate you want to. It is a question of how much exposed area there is to burn at once. The SRB motors have a * shaped hole in the middle of them right from top to bottom. This produces a very large (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
119 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
