To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 791
790  |  792
Subject: 
Re: Transit Time to Mars
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:59:11 GMT
Viewed: 
278 times
  
Solid fuel rockets are essentially big fireworks: ya light 'em and they
burn until nothing is left.  They are great bang for your buck, but they
don't last long.  And in your scenario, you still have to get the boosters
up to the space station.

Actually, you can make them burn at almost any rate you want to.  It is a
question of how much exposed area there is to burn at once.  The SRB motors
have a * shaped hole in the middle of them right from top to bottom.  This
produces a very large amout of thrust (2 million Lb's each, IIRC), but a burn
time of in the order of 60 sec.  If you had a 80 ft long motor that was solid,
end burning, it would last much longer (at least, in a ideal world).  How much
longer depends on your choice of fuel...are you using Iron and Oxygen?  or
Aluminum Perclorate?  Or TNT?

I have a nice book on the subject, Rocketry and Space Travel, which goes into
some detail about the early rocketry experiments.

(oh, I would argue with Larry about the easiest way -right now- to get a 1G
acceleration out of earth's atmosphere/fallout range...use a Nuclear rocket, a
la the USAF experiments...Not good in Atomosphere, but not a whit of difference
in space.)

James P

James Powell



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) (Unless you believe in subspace ruptures. ;) --Todd (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
James Powell <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:FMt9In.55E@lugnet.com... (...) boosters (...) motors (...) burn (...) solid, (...) much (...) into (...) 1G (...) rocket, a (...) difference (...) Wow!..My first job was designing (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) How do those work? and how much fallout do they leave behind, hanging in space, waiting for the next vehicle to pass through? I mean, it's not like radiation shielding isn't difficult enough already.. Anyway, what was it again, Project Orion? (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) Care to expand on these "USAF experiments"? Got links? Steve (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:59:11 GMT, James Powell uttered the following profundities... (...) Weren't these banned under one of the START treaties? I seem to recall some treaty of some description banning most types of Nuclear rockets. It could, (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) Paper mache rockets? The delivery system burns up with the fuel it contains? __ :-O (Edvard Munch's "The Scream") -- Bruce (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

119 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR