To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 791
790  |  792
Subject: 
Re: Transit Time to Mars
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:59:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1917 times
  
> Solid fuel rockets are essentially big fireworks: ya light 'em and they
> burn until nothing is left.  They are great bang for your buck, but they
> don't last long.  And in your scenario, you still have to get the boosters
> up to the space station.

Actually, you can make them burn at almost any rate you want to.  It is a
question of how much exposed area there is to burn at once.  The SRB motors
have a * shaped hole in the middle of them right from top to bottom.  This
produces a very large amout of thrust (2 million Lb's each, IIRC), but a burn
time of in the order of 60 sec.  If you had a 80 ft long motor that was solid,
end burning, it would last much longer (at least, in a ideal world).  How much
longer depends on your choice of fuel...are you using Iron and Oxygen?  or
Aluminum Perclorate?  Or TNT?

I have a nice book on the subject, Rocketry and Space Travel, which goes into
some detail about the early rocketry experiments.

(oh, I would argue with Larry about the easiest way -right now- to get a 1G
acceleration out of earth's atmosphere/fallout range...use a Nuclear rocket, a
la the USAF experiments...Not good in Atomosphere, but not a whit of difference
in space.)

James P

James Powell



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) (Unless you believe in subspace ruptures. ;) --Todd (27 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
James Powell <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:FMt9In.55E@lugnet.com... (...) boosters (...) motors (...) burn (...) solid, (...) much (...) into (...) 1G (...) rocket, a (...) difference (...) Wow!..My first job was designing (...) (27 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) How do those work? and how much fallout do they leave behind, hanging in space, waiting for the next vehicle to pass through? I mean, it's not like radiation shielding isn't difficult enough already.. Anyway, what was it again, Project Orion? (...) (27 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) Care to expand on these "USAF experiments"? Got links? Steve (27 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:59:11 GMT, James Powell uttered the following profundities... (...) Weren't these banned under one of the START treaties? I seem to recall some treaty of some description banning most types of Nuclear rockets. It could, (...) (27 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Transit Time to Mars
 
(...) Paper mache rockets? The delivery system burns up with the fuel it contains? __ :-O (Edvard Munch's "The Scream") -- Bruce (27 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

119 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR