Subject:
|
Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:37:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
247 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:59:11 GMT, "James Powell"
<wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote:
> (oh, I would argue with Larry about the easiest way -right now- to get a 1G
> acceleration out of earth's atmosphere/fallout range...use a Nuclear rocket, a
> la the USAF experiments...Not good in Atomosphere, but not a whit of difference
> in space.)
How do those work? and how much fallout do they leave behind, hanging
in space, waiting for the next vehicle to pass through? I mean, it's
not like radiation shielding isn't difficult enough already..
Anyway, what was it again, Project Orion?
Build a bloody huge metal/concrete platform, take the worlds supply of
nukes, detonate in series underneath. High, if shocky, thrust upward.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
| (...) a (...) difference (...) You use Hydrogen gas as the coolant on a nuclear reactor, then vent it out the backside ('hot' as in thermally hot, not radioactive) The radiation from it is not all that intense...space is a vast area, and radiation (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Transit Time to Mars
|
| (...) Actually, you can make them burn at almost any rate you want to. It is a question of how much exposed area there is to burn at once. The SRB motors have a * shaped hole in the middle of them right from top to bottom. This produces a very large (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
119 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
