 | | Arrggh!
|
| 10GB of MP3 on a FAT32 disk, Win2k, an Intel PII 266 @ 333 (4x 83MHz) is NOT a good combination, I just found out. The filesystem crashed and I now have about 4000 FILExxxx.CHK files instead of a nice directory-tree with sorted and labeled MP3's... (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) Ouch... I'm similar...hasn't crashed yet. 4-5GB of MP3s on a FAT32, Win2k on a PII400 with 256mb RAM. Better do some backing up.... (Hopefully I won't have to) feel your frustration. :\ -Tim (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) Well, I had my CPU overclocked from 66MHz on the bus to 83 so it's all my bad I guess.. (...) LOL! Well, I can get a hold of 'em again but all the work in getting them into the right folders etc. is gone :( /Tobbe (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| How do you get *10 GB's* of MP3's? Doesnt that take *years* to download? Or maybe you're running DSL/Cable/ISDN/whatever? --Tobias, who only has about 300 MB of MP3's... Then again, the iBook harddrive isn't big... (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) You can always encode the MP3's from your own CD's. You'd need somewhere like 80 CDs to get 10 GB og .mp3-files, though. But that number depends heavily on the bitrate you choose when encoding, as well as the running lenght of your CDs! (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) Download? For most of the MP3s that I want, that would be illegal. So instead I rip my own -- now I can stream MP3s to work from home without people stealing my CDs any more. :) Not to mention how much easier it is to create playlists... Chris (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) Why would it be illegal to download an MP3 version of a CD you own, yet be legal to rip your own? I mean, the whole point of digital media is that two copies are exactly identical.... (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) Because in one case it's deemed fair use; in the other you're republishing the work. But I don't claim to understand the legal intricacies to really be able to explain this intelligently. However, since MP3.com was sued for this exact same (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) But there's *exactly* no difference. If I make an MP3 of a track from my own CD, it'll be exactly completely the same as one I download from the internet (assuming the same software and options used to create it). If the law doesn't recognize (...) (24 years ago, 19-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Arrggh!
|
| (...) Not because they had copies (that's fair use under the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, United States Code, Title 17, section 1008), but because they *distributed* copies for which they had no license (17 USC s. 1103). Chris FUT: (...) (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
