Subject:
|
Re: hey ms windows folks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 23:11:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgAVOIDSPAM
|
Viewed:
|
160 times
|
| |
|
|
I just tried a Mozilla nightly (not K-meleon, which doesn't currently work
with Win95) on my PPro 180 system (the Linux numbers were from my PIII 450
at work) and it took 12 seconds to load. (Communicator 4.75 takes 4.) If
K-meleon isn't much better than that, it's sure not meeting its goal.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: hey ms windows folks
|
| (...) Huh. How long does NS4 take, for comparison? (IE of course cheats, by loading a bunch of itself at system startup time. One of the advantages (all other concerns aside) of tight OS integration.) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
