Subject:
|
Re: hey ms windows folks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Aug 2000 20:46:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@spamlessMATTDM.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
129 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> I was a bit disappointed about the load-time. The whole push for this
> thing (reading the website lit) is the lightweightedness of it.
Like how long of a load time?
Mozilla seems to take long (15 seconds?) to load the first time I run it
(per user) after building, but then takes 4-6 seconds. Perhaps K-Meleon has
this property too.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: hey ms windows folks
|
| (...) It's about 10 seconds to launch K-Meleon. That's after I've launched and relaunched a few times, so most of the files should be in the disk-cache. I've got a tempermental Gateway e-4200. That's a PII 400MHz, with 128MB RAM. Typical hard-drive. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: hey ms windows folks
|
| (...) I downloaded it, fired off a few pages into it. It looks ok, but I haven't exactly tested it *rigorously*. I was a bit disappointed about the load-time. The whole push for this thing (reading the website lit) is the lightweightedness of it. (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
