Subject:
|
Re: hey ms windows folks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:21:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDMnomorespam.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
161 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> It's about 10 seconds to launch K-Meleon. That's after I've launched and
> relaunched a few times, so most of the files should be in the disk-cache.
Huh. How long does NS4 take, for comparison? (IE of course cheats, by
loading a bunch of itself at system startup time. One of the advantages
(all other concerns aside) of tight OS integration.)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: hey ms windows folks
|
| I just tried a Mozilla nightly (not K-meleon, which doesn't currently work with Win95) on my PPro 180 system (the Linux numbers were from my PIII 450 at work) and it took 12 seconds to load. (Communicator 4.75 takes 4.) If K-meleon isn't much better (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: hey ms windows folks
|
| (...) It's about 10 seconds to launch K-Meleon. That's after I've launched and relaunched a few times, so most of the files should be in the disk-cache. I've got a tempermental Gateway e-4200. That's a PII 400MHz, with 128MB RAM. Typical hard-drive. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
