Subject:
|
Re: CGI question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 04:38:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
123 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Sproaticus wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Javascript story: I just came across someone the other day who was mad
> > because he had to "covert all his equal signs into double-equals so they'd
> > work with netscape". Hrm. Not exactly confidence-inspiring, that.
>
> I had a C programming class in college with this woman who was upset that
> "MOVE TO" and "MULTIPLY BY" weren't part of the C language. The moment she
> said that, an eerie silence fell over the classroom...
>
> The punchline is that two years later, she was making more money than any of
> us, doing Y2K fixes.
Scary bit of COBOL code one of my co-workers ran across today (he was
given the code because it's the closest thing to documentation available
for a file he has to deal with):
IF FLD_XYZ_YR < 29 THEN
FLD_XYZ_YR4 = 2000 + FLD_XYZ_YR4
ELSE
FLD_XYZ_YR4 = 1900 + FLD_XYZ_YR4
ENDIF
(ok, ok; this isn't the verbatim code. But the meaning is there.)
I'd say the Y2K programmers haven't earned their last overtime bonus
yet.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) Sure. That's a pretty typical Y2K fix. And it's basically what you do as a human when looking at a two-digit year. (If I tell you that the expiration date on my driver's license is 12-30-02, you assume 2002. If I tell you it's 12-30-98, you (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) I had a C programming class in college with this woman who was upset that "MOVE TO" and "MULTIPLY BY" weren't part of the C language. The moment she said that, an eerie silence fell over the classroom... The punchline is that two years later, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
14 Messages in This Thread: ![CGI question -Paul Foster (6-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Dan Boger (6-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Christopher Lindsey (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Jeremy H. Sproat (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Dan Boger (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Matthew Miller (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Jeremy H. Sproat (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Matthew Miller (8-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Steve Bliss (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Matthew Miller (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Dan Boger (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Todd Lehman (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Paul Foster (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|