Subject:
|
Re: CGI question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 01:29:52 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.%IHateSpam%org
|
Viewed:
|
133 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Sproaticus <jsproat@io.com> wrote:
> Java != Javascript. One is a highly-structured and (IMO) relatively elegant
> programming language, the other is a gaping security hole masquerading as
> useless browser eye candy. Aside from Netscape's bone-headed marketing
> decision to name one after the other, they have extremely little to do with
> each other.
Javascript story: I just came across someone the other day who was mad
because he had to "covert all his equal signs into double-equals so they'd
work with netscape". Hrm. Not exactly confidence-inspiring, that.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) I had a C programming class in college with this woman who was upset that "MOVE TO" and "MULTIPLY BY" weren't part of the C language. The moment she said that, an eerie silence fell over the classroom... The punchline is that two years later, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) Reject it on the server end, and serve the form again with an appropriate error message. If you were using the CGI module (1), return an error if (for example) $cgi->param("Vlogin") returns a blank string. Oh, yeah. And don't rely on (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
14 Messages in This Thread: ![CGI question -Paul Foster (6-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Dan Boger (6-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Christopher Lindsey (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Jeremy H. Sproat (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Dan Boger (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Jeremy H. Sproat (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Steve Bliss (8-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Matthew Miller (8-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Steve Bliss (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Matthew Miller (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Dan Boger (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Todd Lehman (10-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: CGI question -Paul Foster (7-Apr-00 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|