 | | Re: Netscape Navigator 4.[67] memory leak under RHL6.1+Gnome?
|
|
(...) I kept searching around on the net for more info on memory leaks in the Linux release of NN, and everything (not much) that turned up was either really old or only for Win32 or didn't match what I was seeing. So I figured it *had* to be (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape Navigator 4.[67] memory leak under RHL6.1+Gnome?
|
|
(...) Ack, what am I smoking? I'm looking at the wrong number. 30M is the non- swapped-out portion. The real size is actually up there around 80M, and slowly climbing. Now 90M. :-/ Well, at least it's less bad now, even if it's still pretty bad. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape Navigator 4.[67] memory leak under RHL6.1+Gnome?
|
|
(...) Well, did some more digging and there actually are hundreds of Usenet posts about this very problem, scattered across various newsgroups. There doesn't seem to be any fix. --Todd (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape Navigator 4.[67] memory leak under RHL6.1+Gnome?
|
|
(...) Yeah, makes you want to switch to Opera for Linux when it comes out... :) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape Navigator 4.[67] memory leak under RHL6.1+Gnome?
|
|
(...) Yah, I sure would if it were...it can't be that much worse than NN. The Win32 version of Opera drove me insane in the way it rendered stuff and handled cookies, but at least it was stable. BTW, I gave Sun's StarOffice browser a twirl tonight (...) (25 years ago, 14-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
