 | | Re: RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!)
|
|
(...) Good points. It can be argued that massive flame-war threads *are* indicative of the level of community. If only because people care enough to get into long-winded pointless debates. (...) Not sure about this, except to look for posts with (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which telnet emulator for Win32?
|
|
(...) A resounding "yes" on all counts. Cool, thanks! :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!)
|
|
[ (X)FUT lugnet.off-topic.geek and lugnet.admin.general ] Steve: [...] (...) Few or many messages per thread? - few messages per thread could mean - quick correct answers - nobody cares to discuss anything - many messages per thread could mean - (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl question
|
|
(...) Doh! I had no idea there was a function to do it already! DaveE (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Which telnet emulator for Win32?
|
|
(...) I think NetTerm is what you're looking for. <URL:(URL) The "phone book" is less than user friendly, unless they've fixed that since I last looked. (I use ssh exclusively these days, so it's SecureCRT for me. (actually, a great terminal (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Which telnet emulator for Win32?
|
|
Hey all, I'm getting fed up with my current Win32 telnet emulator. Having broken my teeth on Telix and Telemate (DOS dialup term apps), I'm noticing a surprising lack of features in every telnet emulator I've come across. I am currently using (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) Oh, no argument there. MS's cert stuff is certainly a cash cow for them, and so pitifully unprofessional compared to other companies' like Novell's. NT 4 came out when - 1996? The training materials I used this year contain errors, typos, and (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) I meant that M$[1] was the one continuing to suck the money out of the industry by pushing certification stuff on people and companies. --Todd [1] I have to write "M$" for Microsoft, to avoid confusiong with MS for Mike Stanley :-) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) Yep, that's the impression I got. The 2 people I know who passed it probably know half what I know and they thought it was cake. (...) Thanks! I've only been playing with NT since a year or so after 4.0 came out, and only been working with it (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) Dunno - is that a rhetorical question? I'm not sucking much money at all out of the industry right now, although I hope to be sucking a lot more (DO NOT quote that out of context John Neal) out of it within the next 6 months. Then again, the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
