 | | Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
| (...) My problem with the Matrix is that they put (obviously) a lot of work into little easter eggs like that essay expounds on, and have done an generally quite credible job of hanging their mythology carefully - and then they hung the whole thing (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
| (...) Uh... Yeah Trekkies do get into Star Trek that much. I have been told all sorts of scientific "facts" by Trekkies. Such as; heat is not a form of kinetic energy, mass has nothing to do with momentum, NASA wishes they could harness the power of (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler wrote: snip (...) Think it's just the rantings of a fan... Yeah, he went a little overboard in some bits, like fans sometimes do :) Dave K (23 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | More hangin' in geek...
|
| (URL) Star Trek was brought up... :) Dave K (23 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Matrix Reloaded explained...
|
| (...) Is it official in any way, or is it an imaginitive fan connecting the dots? I confess, when it got into the wacky numerology bit ("Hey, one has three letters and three is divisible by One") I got a little queasy and had to look away. (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
|
