 | | Re: What if Steve Jobs ran The LEGO Company?
|
|
You can talk about my software, Steve... it's even on the web too. More of the this story: (...) Scott from Datavision called again today! "Everything ok there? I just received 4 or 5 of the 400mhz units. You know anyone waiting for one?" As a (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: What if Steve Jobs ran The LEGO Company?
|
|
(...) And what a nice machine you got. You never NDA'd me, so I can talk about your software? Steve (24 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: MSIE5.5 New Window
|
|
Also: I keep hearing people go on about how IE won the browser war by, admit it, being a better browser. Do these people *use* bookmarks? I mean, sure, Netscape's system isn't perfect, but it looks wonderful in comparison. (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: MSIE5.5 New Window
|
|
(...) Pretty sure that's a "feature". I hate it too. (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Microsoft spreads Linux FUD
|
|
(...) I'm more concerned about things going the other way -- IP laws, especially software patents, but also bans on reverse engineering (as with DeCSS), being extended to the point where open source can't reasonably compete. The situation with DeCSS (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | MSIE5.5 New Window
|
|
I'm using MSIE5.5 on my new computer...I like it a lot but I'm still getting used to some things. When I hit Ctrl-N to open a new browser window, for example, it actually makes a clone copy of the current window rather than opening a new blank (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Microsoft spreads Linux FUD
|
|
(...) get your PhD from Georgia Tech and be this boneheaded (Or maybe you can, I am biased...). His arguments don't make sense in the context that this article is presented. On the other hand, it would be really easy to understand his arguments if (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Microsoft spreads Linux FUD
|
|
(...) We had some of this debate before... I'm not sure what I think, exactly. Open Source clearly works and delivers good things but there has to be an incentive of some sort to cause clever people to do clever things. Whether IP is the best way, I (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Microsoft spreads Linux FUD
|
|
(...) I think that the point that they are inarticulately trying to make is: "The system of proprietary intellectual property rights provides an incentive to put money into research. The principles of openness and sharing demonstrated in the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Microsoft spreads Linux FUD
|
|
(...) Well, this part IS true, as far as it goes. That's the idea, after all!!! If you read the GNU Manifesto, it comes through loud and clear. MS has a simple answer to it though, make stuff that's so much *better* than what you can get for free (...) (24 years ago, 18-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
