 | | Re: So you think you know your stuff?
|
|
(...) I just rebooted my system into Win98, installed the Flash 5 player into Netscape, and the swf tells me I don't have Flash 5. So I guess I'll try the exe version... (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
Any Win32 based software package should function great. IE ML-Cad. However LDraw most likely will not run due to the DOS mode that will make direct hardware calls. I'm currently running Windows 2000 on another computer and was playing with ML-Cad on (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
"Heather Patey" <hpatey@nfld.com> wrote in message news:G5ttBJ.EDA@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) I've already made the move. As far as I can tell, everything works except the original LEdit, becuase win2k doesn't like DOS applications. You can still (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
I'm about to upgrade my operating system from Win95 to Win2K. Has anyone done this yet, and are there issues with the common LCAD software that I ought to be aware of? Wouldn't want to be stuck without my virtual bricks. Thanks, Heather -- Heather (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: So you think you know your stuff?
|
|
(...) That's odd... You're right, the system requirements page at (URL) that Flash 5 is available for Linux. But when I try to download it I can only get Flash 4, and the download page says the same thing: (URL) to be on the safe side I downloaded (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: So you think you know your stuff?
|
|
"Christopher Lindsey" <lindsey@nospam.mallorn.com> wrote in message news:3A3EEF5D.84BF58...orn.com... (...) gives (...) as (...) just (...) You (...) looking (...) Ah, the SWF file is also so there so as long as you have an OS that Macromedia have (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: So you think you know your stuff?
|
|
(...) or the Flash 5 requirement eliminate a fair number of techies? I was looking to put a team together at work, but nobody wanted to install Windows on a system just for this... :) Chris (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | So you think you know your stuff?
|
|
As a bit of a laugh (and to get people to use my company's web site) the company I run the web site for has written a Flash application that gives you 60 seconds to answer as many techie (and some non-techie) questions as possible, and there are a (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl5 regexen: exponential backtracking behavior when mixing \n and \s
|
|
(...) Yup! lindsey@wolrab|/afs/...dsey|[65]> /usr/bin/perl -v This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i386-linux Chris (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl5 regexen: exponential backtracking behavior when mixing \n and \s
|
|
(...) yah, that's what I got as well: greywolf$ perl -v This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i686-linux guess 5.6 kicks bootie :) (24 years ago, 17-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
