 | | Re: VT100 over the web
|
|
(...) I'd tend to agree with you on that. VT100 with half duplex continually sends screen updates with every keystroke (1), after which it needs to render the escape codes (termcap?) properly. Server performance would take a serious hit, both in (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Web hosting
|
|
(...) Well I can highly recommend Pair networks ( (URL) ) which is where I have (URL) and (URL) and it is where LUGNET is hosted. Its quite possible it is more than you want to spend though. To get SSI and CGI scripts enabled you need at least a (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Web hosting
|
|
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I can cheaply get web space with SSI and CGI-scripts enabled? Case Western Reserve University will give me web space next year, but without the extra goodies I want/need to make my site easier to maintain. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: VT100 over the web
|
|
(...) I see them in the correct form for charset=iso-8859-1, which is what you're using. :) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: VT100 over the web
|
|
(...) Heheh.. Mine has that ü thing also, as well as ç,ö,þ,ð,ý and Ý (I know, you even can't see the last four in correct form..:-) selÇuk gÖre ..:-) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | VT100 over the web
|
|
Is it even possible? My researches so far have not turned up a product, and in thinking about the problem, the VT100 protocol stream is richer than HTML, in some ways of looking at it. We are trying to determine the feasibility of replacing client (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Fun with squirm
|
|
(...) way) too small for me under linux... [ -> .admin.general ] (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Fun with squirm
|
|
(...) Won't work like that, 'cause Squid is pretty strict about the validity of hostnames. (Technically, they shouldn't start with a number, either, but I guess it's not that strict.) You could use something like "q7121", though. (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Fun with squirm
|
|
(...) Hey, that's pretty cool! (I'm not using squirm but I can imagine how it works from your description.) What happens if you do this?-- regexi (2 URLs) #!/bin/sh echo -ne "Location: (URL) type in, say, ^7121 --Todd (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Fun with squirm
|
|
I'm using the squirm redirector together with squid to block banner ads. Netscape Navigator for Unix tries to load any URL which you paste into the browser window. So, select a URL, then middle-click on your browser window, and poof, you're there. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Mozilla...
|
|
(...) Well, I just downloaded and installed M16 and tried to recreate the crash I was getting before - couldn't do it. All I did before was select all the text from the end of your post to the end of your sig and hit backspace and WHAM! it would (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Editing Member Pages & Netscape
|
|
(...) I haven't had a problem with crashing in quite a while, although the speed seems to vary from day to day. Unfortunately, I think they've got a long way to go before it's Done. (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Editing Member Pages & Netscape
|
|
(...) thought (...) You're right - I probably am being overly critical of 6 considering its preview status. I downloaded the latest build of mozilla and tried repeatedly to respond to this message with it but it kept crashing. Otherwise it did seem (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Editing Member Pages & Netscape
|
|
(...) Remember, it's not a released product yet. The current daily builds of mozilla are much better. Expect a big improvement from the next Netscape beta. (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Editing Member Pages & Netscape
|
|
(...) I'm glad that it isn't just me who found Netscape6 ridiculously slow. I thought it might be the fact I'm running on a p166, and perhaps it was geared towards a higher platform. But even simple things like scrolling my messages in my inbox (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Xcam's?
|
|
I know we've all seen the ads for the Xcam and Xcam2 from X10.com around the web, but has anyone around here actually used one? I ask because I just ordered a DVD Anywhere from X10.com yesterday so I can send mp3's and maybe video from my computer (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Pointless
|
|
(...) Yah! Get a bunch of those convention "My name is ___" tags, scribble their names in the blanks, and staple the tags onto the individual ants. Superglue might work too. This is how I straightened out my school of candiru -- except since the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Wow! This guy is good!
|
|
(...) (Looking at long string of discussion) I'm sorry I mentioned it. That should have been "Let's not *discuss* the Apple ][..." The horror...the horror...(where was Martin Sheen when I needed him)... Bruce (should I mention the horrors of drawing (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Graphics Programming on the Apple II (was: Wow! This guy is good!)
|
|
(...) I agree that the underlying hardware is completely different, but the net result of having subpixels is similar, and leads to remarkably similar software solutions. (So much so that I hope it counts as prior art, 'cause it is an interesting (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
