|
|
 | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) Javascript story: I just came across someone the other day who was mad because he had to "covert all his equal signs into double-equals so they'd work with netscape". Hrm. Not exactly confidence-inspiring, that. (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) nod, exactly. (...) you're very correct, I'm sorry. I don't have much experience with either java or JS, so the two unknowns are very similar. I do know that java is a respectable language though :) Dan (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) Reject it on the server end, and serve the form again with an appropriate error message. If you were using the CGI module (1), return an error if (for example) $cgi->param("Vlogin") returns a blank string. Oh, yeah. And don't rely on (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) I agree that JavaScript really isn't the best way to validate this. As long as you're doing CGI, why not do a POST to the same script, evaluate, the answers, and complain if they're not any good? With regards to the multiple fields, I think (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: CGI question
|
| (...) well, not sure how you can do it with java, but you shouldn't rely on java for form validation anyhow - it's unreliable, and easily overcome. If you had to, you could add another text field, in which case enter won't submit the form, and you'd (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | CGI question
|
| I have the following perl script that I inherited in a program I am supposed to fix, the perl I understand, but I'm not really up on Forms.. (URL) you enter a login and then hit the submit button and things work well. If you hit submit with no text (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Dark Side Developer's Kit at Toy World
|
| In the May 2000 issue of Lee's Action Figure Guide, there is a full page spread on the Dark Side Developer's Kit. One of the alternate models is a _very_ cool looking Destroyer Droid, a la Episode I. Check it out, if you get a chance (and can find (...) (25 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Tasty!
|
| lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) wrote in <FDx1ww.ME0@lugnet.com>: (...) Between 600 and 700. Am I the only geek who did testing on this as a kid? Later, Gino A... PS I know this is a very old thread. That's what I get for deciding to start reading (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: how do I set "follow-ups to" in Outlook Express 5.0 ?
|
| "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8eg1iq.cfn.....bu.edu... (...) field (...) true enough but the question remains.... never mind I found it .. when composing the message click view then select "All Headers", i set fut (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Geek Pride Festival
|
| I guess it did happen :/ sorry i missed it. (URL) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
