 | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week —Jasper Janssen
| | | | (...) No. (...) Unlikely, most dates that old get '19' prefixed. or "20", as the case may be. Jasper (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Yes, but is it: January 2, 2003 January 3, 2002 February 1, 2003 February 3, 2001 March 1, 2002 March 2, 2001 (ignoring the six dates from a century earlier) Not that I was asking for a clear answer. It was just my example of an ultimately (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week —Jasper Janssen
| | | | | (...) I'd go for 1st of feb '03. But then, my country is pretty strict in dd/mm/yy. Jasper (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) My country is very settled on mm/dd/yy. The issue is international interpretation, of course. Steve (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | |
