|
|
 | | §Infer Monkeys for Parrots!§
|
| ~Infer Monkeys for Parrots! (My Gawd, we’re the same person?) {see comments within…} (URL) see comments below..} (...) What kinda sick *monkey fetish* do we share? Is it the feces throwin’ thing… cause I'm not into that! And another thing, why are (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Both sides!
|
| But as I assume the Patent and Trademark office have yet to grant registration of Stubbies then they cannot use the ® symbol, and as they do not manufacture the product themselves they cannot claim tm on it either. However seeing as it is a creative (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Galidor Online game
|
| (...) They're in Toys R Us, and they are Barbie dolls with Technic peg connectors. (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Both sides!
|
| (...) Ummm, coypright is for creative works, not trademarks or service marks. Trademarks would get (TM) or (R). But I bet you new that and you were just following the rule that all corrections must themselves contain an error... --Bill. (22 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Galidor Online game
|
| Hello, I haven't seen the Galidor sets yet, so I have no idea how good they are, but I've been enjoying the online RPG game at www.galidor.com. I am stuck in a few places, however, and have been trying in vain to find some hints for the game. Would (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Both sides!
|
| (...) *Ahem, Ahem, Ahum!* Gerber/Noeckel. Matt 8?P (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Both sides!
|
| (...) *Ahem, Ahem!* Co-operative, joint, ownership of the Trade Marked “Stubbies” © is mutually shared by the Noeckel/Gerber Conglomerate! --==RïçhårÐ==-- ;) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Is it worth it?
|
| (...) Thank you Lar, I appreciate you giving me the benefit of the doubt. Enough so that I will forgive you for cross-posting my little faux pas to the group in which it is the most likely to be seen by all the hard core grammar cops! Maggie (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Is it worth it?
|
| (...) um, I think this is supposed to say "Your welcome in .castle will be worn out if you do not go buy this. :-) " I can believe that Maggie may have hit send too soon, but NOT that she would make a grammatical mistake. FUT .fun ++Lar (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Another one for Maggie (and or Dave!)
|
| (...) This must be an exclusive of the germanic languages... :-P In 4 Latin languages this fish is referred to as: Atum (Portuguese) Thon (French) Atún (Spanish) Tonno (Italian) So, my guess is the "Barbarian Invaders" used the Latin name of the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
