 | | Re: Important Questions
|
|
Look you two, this kind of fun has no business in .debate. ;-) (...) You must not have cats. We put it opposite the way you do to avoid having completely unravelled and turned into confetti in the night. Chris (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Important Questions
|
|
(...) Only if "YOU ARE INSIDE A BUILDING, A WELL HOUSE FOR A LARGE SPRING", or "YOU ARE IN A LARGE ROOM, WITH A PASSAGE TO THE SOUTH, A PASSAGE TO THE WEST, AND A WALL OF BROKEN ROCK TO THE EAST" and "THERE IS A LARGE "\'Y2' ON A ROCK IN THE ROOM'S (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Important Questions
|
|
Greetings all, It seems to me that LUGNET could use a good lighthearted release from all the friction that's gone on here recently. To that end, I've developed a list of questions that I think we ought to consider... If you're exploring a mammoth (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | My K'Nex monstrosity made it into the paper!
|
|
The Napa Valley Register printed an article on the 18 foot tall K'Nex monstrosity that my cousins and I built in my living room. They even included a couple of color pictures on page 1D, plus a black and white one on the second page. Yes, the (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf bug: files ending in .jpeg
|
|
(...) ROFL! /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: nits! (that is, Nits factorial) (was re contacting Lego Australia)
|
|
(...) Fine, Lar, but the eqn I cited defines z!! for all complex z[1], so 3.141592654!! *is* a valid expression, whether you wanna call it double factorial or not. ROSCO [1] In fact, it doesn't - it erroneously uses x on the right side of the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the Clones Trailer Tonight on Fox
|
|
(...) Absolutely! "off-topic.fun" and "starwars" are the perfect groups to place it in. I've pretty much given up on Sunday evening TV, so I'm going to turn it on tonight just to watch that! (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Attack of the Clones Trailer Tonight on Fox
|
|
(...) I no way is anybody slighted by your postin’ placement! ~In fact I for one am elated at the news. If not for your message I would have likely *missed the trailer entirely. ¤Sincerely, --==RïçhårÐ==-- *cause after ‘Malcolm’ I'm usually affixed (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Attack of the Clones Trailer Tonight on Fox
|
|
Hi all, Fox will air a 2 1/2 minute trailer for Attack of the Clones tonight between Malcolm in the Middle and X-Files. Details at: (URL) C. (who will not be insulted if you tell me I posted to the wrong group(s)-- just set appropriate FUT) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | nits! (that is, Nits factorial) (was re contacting Lego Australia)
|
|
(...) It does indeed vary. By my book it's clear as day that an extension of something means the original something *doesn't* apply in the extended area. (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) so (...) 8?) A quick calculation gives about 3.32 (but I could have stuffed it up) which isn't the best approximation of pi I've ever seen, but baseball's a silly game, anyway... ROSCO (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) 54... (...) Double factorial equation (8) clearly states "Similarly, the double factorial can be extended to complex arguments as: [eqn image that I can't be bothered linking to]", similarly Factorial eqn (7). Which by my book means these (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) Yes, except for the dirt parts of the infield (first and third base lines, the first to third swath, the pitchers mound, the part from the mound to home plate, etc.) At least in Major League parks they do, unless it's astroturf they are using (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) ...but if the approximation's nearer to 8, your ball park could have a lot of surplus turf Cheers Richie (who wonders whether they turf entire ball parks anyway...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) an EXTENSION of factorial to reals and complex numbers... NOT that factorial itself works with reals. You're holding a busted flush. (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) Certainly! Just not a very good one...although it's somewhere betwee 3 & 8, so it's in the ball park... ROSCO (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) Just don't go to a quintuple factorial: "Five exclamation marks, the sure sign of a diseased mind" -Terry Pratchett (Reaper Man) Cheers Richie (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) While that may be true, you're not claiming that an approximation of pi is 3.141592654!! are you? Cheers Richie (who's happy to use 3.1 or 25/8 as an approximation.) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) I guess I shoulda looked harder: (URL) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
|
(...) Bzzzt. The factorial (and double factorial, !!) can be extended to real & complex arguments, as discussed here: (URL)See your nit(1) and raise you one. (2) (...) I'll be seeing that hand, please!!! [1] ROSCO [1] No, I don't know of a triple (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
