Subject:
|
Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 00:35:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
546 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.loc.au, Ross Crawford writes:
> > > In lugnet.loc.au, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > >
> > > > well, not EXACTLY, no, but I did hear of a draw that had these winning • numbers:
> > > >
> > > > 3 9 14 15 26 53
> > > >
> > > > So there you go (the 9 is out of place but other than that it's
> > > > pi to 10 digits)
> >
> > Whoops!
> > c /pi to 10 digits/the first 10 digits of pi/
> >
> > > Close, but actually pi to 10 digits is 3.141592654!!
> >
> > "Correct", since the next digit after 2653 is >4 so the 53 rounds up to 54...
> >
> > But ACTUALLY INcorrect since " 3.141592654!! " is actually an invalid
> > arithmetic expression. You cannot take factorials of non whole numbers.
>
> Bzzzt. The factorial (and double factorial, !!) can be extended to real &
> complex arguments, as discussed here:
>
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Factorial.html
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DoubleFactorial.html
While that may be true, you're not claiming that an approximation of pi is
3.141592654!! are you?
Cheers
Richie (who's happy to use 3.1 or 25/8 as an approximation.)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Contacting LEGO Australia
|
| (...) Bzzzt. The factorial (and double factorial, !!) can be extended to real & complex arguments, as discussed here: (URL)See your nit(1) and raise you one. (2) (...) I'll be seeing that hand, please!!! [1] ROSCO [1] No, I don't know of a triple (...) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
