Subject:
|
Re: Part 6588 Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:22:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
501 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Tobbe Arnesson wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 20:54:32 GMT, "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com>
> wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.db.brictionary, Steve Bliss writes:
> > > In lugnet.cad.dev, TWS Garrison wrote:
> > > > but this part is only 3 1/3 bricks high. I'd think it was an error, but
> > > > the posts on Lugnet about this part suggest that the name really does make
> > > > sense to everyone else. Can anyone enlighten me?
> > >
> > > The height on this part name was given in plates.
> > > 3 1/3 bricks = 7 plates.
> >
> > ????? By my calculation, 3 1/3 bricks = 10 plates ???????
>
> Steve must use the imperial system or something, 3 1/3 = 10 plates in
> Sweden too :)
:p
So math isn't my strength.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread: ![Part 6588 Question -Thomas Garrison (16-Feb-02 to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Part 6588 Question -Steve Bliss (16-Feb-02 to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Part 6588 Question -Ross Crawford (16-Feb-02 to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Part 6588 Question -Tobbe Arnesson (17-Feb-02 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Part 6588 Question -Steve Bliss (18-Feb-02 to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|