|
|
 | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| (...) Sounds like you have a brave little guy. My step-daughter is nearly 6, and her dad let her see a cartoon version of LoTR a few weeks back. She has been unable to sleep through the night due to her terror of the Black Knights. I saw rows of (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: If you google the phrase "Spooky Bible Stories"...
|
| (...) Well, I don't know about him, but this site is an interesting discussion of LotR (which is actually satire, if you read it closely): (URL) (Of course, that's not really one for the kids, despite its lack of vulgarity.) best LFB (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) It's just an initial reaction, based in part on enthusiasm. Yes, I enjoyed it (note that it is up for a Golden Globe for Best Picture already!), no it isn't the best movie of all time, but in my view it is only the first third of an (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) Yes, its well deserved…and its only gonna get better with the sequels. Mind you, the first book -IS- the slow one…it sets the pace and background for the next two!!! “Bigger than Star Wars” Indeed, --==RiçhärÐ==-- (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) Modern movies tend to spike to the top of the list, because they're fresher in people's minds. I seem to remember, though, that they tend to settle down a little bit after time. Adrian (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| (...) My son is ten. The only problem he had was what the other poster mentioned: even though he went to the restroom just before the start of the movie, he had to go midway through (I sent him at the safest point when little would happen onscreen) (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) It was a good movie. A solid, though flawed, interpretation of a book that is among the greatest masterpieces of literature ever produced. As a movie, the Fellowship of the Ring lacked the subtleties of emotion and sensitivity that sets a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: If you google the phrase "Spooky Bible Stories"...
|
| AAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!! Hop-Frog, don't lead us to stuff like this, please! Have mercy!!! Seriously though, is this guy for real? -Dave (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Lord of the Rings movie
|
| Note: the second time through I listened to the music more. It's good too. Darn it, it has been in my head all day. You can hear the entire album in QuickTime: (URL) movies cost 30% less in the Midwest... (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| Here's something I don't understand. WHY would anyone take children under the age of 10 to see this film. First off, it's rated PG-13. Secondly, it's 3 hours long. Finally, the story isn't suitable for younger viewers anymore than the Matrix was. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
