 | | Re: Lugnet can always grow; it's up to us to make it happen.
|
|
(...) Not necessarily. I didn't do it to make the point (which would have been wayyy off topic), I did it to imply that I was saying kudos. I think you're right that it's abstract; I should have put it in scare quotes, but I dislike them enough that (...) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet can always grow; it's up to us to make it happen.
|
|
(...) What a terrible way to live! I hope those complaining about the $10 cost of a Lugnet membership can appreciate this example of real suffering. I mean, imagine living for three months with the smell of rancid bacon grease permeating all your (...) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet can always grow; it's up to us to make it happen.
|
|
(...) Heck, I wasn't even sure if he HAD broken a rule. The dictionary also said it was a colloquialism, particularly in academia, and since my copy is an edition last updated in 1974, I figured if anyone was up on the latest on the evolution of the (...) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet can always grow; it's up to us to make it happen.
|
|
(...) I had a room-mate in 1991 who would buy a big package of bacon every two weeks on the day he got paid. He'd fry up the bacon and eat it all day the next day. For the remainder of his two-week pay cycle, he would reheat some of the bacon grease (...) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet can always grow; it's up to us to make it happen.
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure that it's an abstract noun (so by itself "kudos" should be article free). But was it okay for Lindsay to break that rule to make his point clearer? (...) !!!! ...we are not worthy... --DaveL (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) Wow! Thank for that tip Chris. I'm so sorry that I can't waste more time on lugnet.off-topic.debate and learn how to insult people. I should take lessons from Larry. Mladen Pejic, over and out! (URL) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.market.auction
|
|
(...) Not likely; LEGO is made of ABS, which is an organic chain; Britney, as rumor has it, is made primarily of silicone. LFB (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) Do everyone a favor and grow up before you post another asinine comment. We like to have mature conversations at Lugnet. (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.market.auction
|
|
(...) I'd rather have legoland build me a sculpture of britney than of myself! I wonder if you could talk them into it if you won?? hehheh Probably not! I bet they won't let you have the sculpture unglued either. What do you think? Has anyone asked? (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.market.auction
|
|
(...) haha, you don't? I doubt that. Anyway it's right there in the heading of the LEGO one as one of the current "featured 3". No searching required. (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) No, not really. I really think that is your favourite word. Mladen Pejic, over and out! (URL) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.market.auction
|
|
(...) sheesh Larry -- I _really_ don't want to know what you were looking for on eBay to find that one... :^) --DaveL (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | lugnet.market.auction
|
|
I'm bummed. This auction (URL) doing WAY better than this one (URL) mean really. ANYONE can get rooms at NYNY, that place isn't nearly as swank as Grand Pacific Palisades... and in one all you get to keep is an autograph and 104 12 packs of Pepsi. (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: I miss the old LUGNET...
|
|
(...) Perhaps she has less practice than you in using the term? (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Bohrok Speculation
|
|
(...) Gezondheid! LFB (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Bohrok Speculation
|
|
(...) Excuse me? (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Bohrok Speculation
|
|
I am sorry, I cannot find that in Shiri's acronym guide. Jude (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) Syntax sucks (only written using improper syntax... ;) John #388 (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) ?? Communication wasn't did. What are you trying to say? (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Toy Grading Standards Now Live!
|
|
(...) ...and sucks syntax! John #388 (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
