 | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Most of the rest of this is pretty depressing PCness but I am totally behind this particular idea, where do I send my donations? :-) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interpretation of history
|
|
(...) ROFLMAO!!! Thanks for posting this, Ross! :-) -Tim (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interpretation of history
|
|
(...) This is semi-apocryphal; call it a quasi-UL. It's been around for some time--the addition of numerals before the points is the part that's new to me. (AFAIK, that was added this year.) The original is at least 25 years old, and probably older; (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Interpretation of history
|
|
With all the talk of historical events in .debate, I thought you might all appreciate the following interpretations of history. Sorry about the formatting. WARNING: Do not read these with food or drink in your mouth, or if you're doing something (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: More voting( Re: More Shamelessly Insisting I Get What I Want
|
|
(...) Perhaps we may view the ill-structured sentence as containing a non-terminating Dave! A reason to avoid this construction is that there is no guarantee of rationality, whereas the implication of rationality CAN be made given the existence of a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
