|
| | Re: Winux 2004 shirt on sluggy.com
|
| (...) I actually have two replies to this post... ---...--- So... that's what the kids are calling it these days... <grin> Jude ---...--- OR ---...--- Is that true Chris? Jude FUT o-t.fun (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Xenogears Sequel?
|
| Well, there have been rumors since many of the people who originally worked on Xenogears joined a Namco subsidiary (Monolith Soft), and now it looks like those rumors may very well be true: (URL) me tell you, I am *so* looking forward to it! :) (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| "J.D. Forinash" <foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu> wrote in message news:9a24pt$u5j$1@an...net.foo... <snip> (...) backward (...) </snip> Overhere we're pretty much metric (*), but we still do the same trick. It's just kilometers per liter. My 1.4 Volvo is (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: Mecha haiku (Was Re: huge japanese page of small mecha)
|
| what a wonderful concept, haiku, mecha, lego... *orgasm* (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Mecha haiku (Was Re: huge japanese page of small mecha)
|
| (...) Gleefully ignore Gravity like the cherry blossom on the wind :^D ~1st Lieutenant, Fleebnork Division Muffin Head (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: Straight Roundness (was Re: Does God have a name for God?)
|
| (...) Hmm. I guess it depends on how rigid the spinning object is, and what you're using as a standard of comparison. If there's no actual axis, but a "net" axis, the rotation might change. Intesting. Dave! (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: Straight Roundness (was Re: Does God have a name for God?)
|
| (...) But when it wobbles would the axis change? I guess the easiest way to test the theory would be to draw a bright red line along the equator of a globe and give the ol girl a good spin and then see if the line stays the same or blurs whilst it's (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) I think it must have been a small tank. :-) (and therefore one that wouldn't do well in a wreck with a bigger tank, but I digress) IIRC, an M1A1 gets about 3 gallons (of Jet A to run its turbines, I think it is) per mile... ++Lar (who drives a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) People joke that way about the cars I've owned, a 1970 Olds Cutlass, a 1981 Chevrolet Suburban, a 1970 Plymouth Fury, a 1999 Dodge Dakota R/T, and a 1969 Dodge Coronet. Hey, they think it's amusing. Me, I know that except in one case, I had (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | Re: MOC 1966 Chevelle
|
| (...) Hehe. Once back many years ago, I looked up to see if tanks got miles per gallon or gallons per mile. I forget which tank I actually looked up, but it still got miles per gallon, but just barely... :-) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |