 | | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
Bruce, (...) Whatever Bruce. I don't think so.His leftword move to the left this election campaign showed his true colors, IMO. But I digress, I don' feel like talking about it. FUT to off.topic.debate, and you guys and talk about it. I will not be (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) Lieberman is a conservative. Why he is in the Democratic party is beyond me. Bruce (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
Lindsey, (...) Tit for tat. B&V does not block his site. I am sure I can get on it with cleanweb as well. Anyway, I know a few liberals that love censorship as well, like Libermann (SP?), for instance, where I disagree with some of the conservative (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) You can always go check the site of Senator Dick Armey, who is one of the staunchest proponents of censorware...oh, wait. His site is blocked out by all known filter programs. ;) There's a site devoted to censorware foibles, including a high (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) I heard someone in outer London last month refer to it as needing to "dyson" the floor. !?! The man creates one silly innovation and suddenly he's a verb. [Re: Gosport, it looks like I'll be in the UK, but whether I can afford to get there, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) But it's only at its best wiv a PROpper INGlish accent mate, nartymean?. (Coming to Gosport btw?) Anyway, I've got to hoover the floor... And another thing, it's "attendees" that really winds me up. It's not a word, and it's the wrong way (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter?
|
|
(...) I just don't remember it being so bluntly obvious as the Iron Tower trilogy was. Perhaps there was some difference in frame of mind when I read them (but note that I did read the Iron Tower trilogy much later than I did Sword of Shanara, and (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter?
|
|
(...) Brooks had scene-for-scene, character-for-character matches (in the same sequence as LOTR) - geez, a fellowship with four little guys, one dwarf, one elf, two men, and a wizard, for heaven's sake. He just added new names, and that was about (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter?
|
|
(...) But the Iron Tower trilogy which was written to give the base series for the later books to rest on had incredible correlation with Lord of the Rings. It seemed like every major scene had a parallel in Lord of the Rings. FUT: (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Music while building
|
|
(...) This is effectively what I've done, though my CD collection is an order of magnitude smaller. I basically set up an encoder to encode as I played them, and eventually pretty much everything was on the hard disk. As I get new CDs, I play them (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) I have a colleague who wrote a rather good book about the survey of India, where he specifically addressed the issue with respect to the plural of "Surveyor General." According to orthodoxy plural should be "Surveyors General," but he (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) The colloquial singular saying is "Roller"; therefore in this case one could possess many Rollers, if one was very affluent. I've never really heard anyone seriously refer to a collection of Rollers as "Rolls-Royce's"; what is perhaps more (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Music while building
|
|
Frank, (...) Indeed. (...) Ah, I see. I certainly like my Minidiscs for work and driving. No skip, editable, etc. It is a really neat item. I know some might not like the compression, btu I am not a music major, it is good enough for me (no offense (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Music while building
|
|
(...) The problem for me would be that I'd definitely need three (and depending on just how many of my albums are double CDs, I might have to trim to fit in 3, I suspect I'm only about 800 CDs though, I've got about 700 albums). Another hassle (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) Sure. I can see the point if you do this and you're gonna use it multiple times *within a single document* (lawyers do it all the time!), and you can even do it using a glossary. What I detest is people who use an acronym *ONCE* and follow it (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) What I had meant to say was that Rolls-Royce is the plural of Rolls-Royce (as opposed to Rolls-Royces). I can't recall where I heard/read this (probably from some snooty old guy like Edith Sedgwick's grandfather-- the one who would be (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) You raise an interesting etymological point--who determines the "proper" pluralization? We're all well aware of the LEGO/Legos issue; while a manufacturer may wish a certain plural form to be used, what happens if no one uses it (or if enough (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Stuff (Was: some other stuff)
|
|
(...) The point is to explain the acronym the first time you use it, then just re-use the acronym where it needs to be repeated. It's actually required by the guidelines for government writing in the UK (or was that an Official Secret? Damn, I can (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Good news for collectors (was Re: 1593 box photos!)
|
|
(...) (URL) to the bottom of the page.) Maggie C. (trying to decide whether to 'fess up about my harrowing caffeine addiction) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Music while building
|
|
To All, (...) Yes, that is correct. I am sure my collection will grow into another one, but hopefully not three! : ) (...) Indeed. Unless of course, you accidently put a LEGO box on top of the keyboard and forgot to unplug it. I have a variety of (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
