 | | Re: John Carpenter
|
|
(...) Carpenter's (...) I haven't, unfortunately. John Carpenter runs very hot and cold- while "Vampires" and "Big Trouble in Little China"[1] are great movies, "They Live" is terrible. eric [1]Trivia Question: What did the project that resulted in (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | John Carpenter
|
|
(...) Anyone seen _Dark Star_? --Todd (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of LEGO on album cover... legal or no?
|
|
(...) Hmmm. Yeah, "The Thing" is one of my favourites, ever since I first saw it (in about '84). And the DVD is good value, too - has some really good commentary about how they did some of the effects. Pretty fun stuff! ROSCO (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of LEGO on album cover... legal or no?
|
|
(...) Haven't seen it, but I've heard lots of good things about it. Starman, The Thing, and Big Trouble... are all pretty good (there's that phrase again!), but Village o' the Darned and In the Mouth of I-wish-I-were-HP-Lovecraft were terrible! (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of LEGO on album cover... legal or no?
|
|
(...) Heh! In my original post, it was Joe Carpenter, I couldn't help changing it to John. I didn't know if anyone would catch it... Some of his recent movies have been realy bad, I agree, but "John Carpenter's Vampires" is thoroughly enjoyable, (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: My First Post
|
|
(...) Way bitchin', dude. Like, totally tubular, y'all. Bruce (SoCal, where we simply Californicate the language) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: My First Post
|
|
(...) "Borned" again? I always thought you Southerners had a certain (lack of) grasp of the language.... <GDR> Matt (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: All your base are belong to us
|
|
(...) I accidentally responded to Mark's question by e-mail... Here's what I said (too lazy to retrieve his message to respond to it): Check: (URL) a couple weeks, or pick look for someone with yesterday's comics section... Basically, Jason (the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
|
|
My God, header frenzy!: (...) Sure, those Cal Tech boys can rig up an RF unit to screw with the Rose Bowl scoreboard, but can they really spell...? It's like asking someone with a doctorate in pediatrics (paediatrics for the ANZAC/UK crowd) to take (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: All your base are belong to us
|
|
And this...... (URL) Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6C688E9.E2EA%s...ink.com... (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: All your base are belong to us
|
|
(...) Nope. Do tell. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: All your base are belong to us
|
|
(...) Frank (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: NOT the Queen's English
|
|
(...) I think they get it from across the pond. They just can't bring themselves to go whole hog, and stand on queue. Steve (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
|
|
(...) Oops, I should clarify that Rolls Royce is both the singular and the plural form. Maggie C. (who has once again sacrificed clarity for the sake of brevity) Oh yes, and I shall henceforth use AFOL as the plural of AFOL since your argument that (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
|
|
(...) ACRONYM: Abbreviation by CROpping Names that Yield Meaning (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
|
|
(...) As opposed to a certain really ominous subject that's inevitably christened "acrostic." Dave! (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
|
|
(...) ACRONYM: A contrived reduction of nomenclature yielding mnemonics.... (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
|
|
(...) Not a "real" word, but a word nonetheless, as opposed to a string of distinct letters. AFOL, if pronounced as a word ("I'm an AFOL") rather than spelled out ("I'm an A-F-O-L"), is an acronym by that definition. The convention was to say "WAC" (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
|
|
(...) "radar" wasn't a word until the technology was invented. So does that mean it isn't an acronym? This is what Dictionary.com has to say about it: ----- ac·ro·nym (kr-nm) n. A word formed from the initial letters of a name, such as WAC for (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
