Subject:
|
Re: All The Money In The World
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:05:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
184 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jon Kozan writes:
> But if you measure "the total money available" as the whatever represents money
> - such as your money order - then there is no limit to the money available in
> the world. Both peices of paper such as your money order and any other object
> (or person), or concept, can, in theory at least, be exchanged for the real
> money, so their is no limit to "the total money available."
So in essence my question was phrased incorrectly--there isn't $1000
available in Boombaville; there's $1000 in printed cash, but there's no
limit on "actual money." Got it.
> Much as it is in the real world - little cash - lots of representatives of
> cash.
Cool! That goes along nicely with my plan to start Xeroxing $100 bills in
quantity. Nobody looks at serial numbers, right?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: All The Money In The World
|
| (...) That would be unethical (which, I believe, is another thread)... However, it is also illegal - and we could debate the reasons why our society has chosen to make such activity illegal, or anything illegal for that matter. Any takers? -Jon :-) (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: All The Money In The World
|
| (...) It depends on how you measure "the total money available." If you measure it as the acutal cash (greenbacks, etc) - then no - you don't have the $10 anymore, and the total money hasn't increased. But if you measure "the total money available" (...) (24 years ago, 21-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
