 | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) 1600x1200 on the desktop, 1024x768 on the laptop, but only cause it won't support anything more... that doesn't mean I have netscape open to full screen... Dan (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) As another 1600x1200er (with small fonts - I've got good eyesight), I plead with web page developers to consider how their pages look on high resolution screens. Lugnet uses some fonts which come out a bit too small, which puts it in the (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah, it's a mess -- the original HTML just wasn't meant to specify presentation. CSS helps a bit. (...) Agreed. If you must specify font, make sure to also list "serif" or "sans-serif". (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | (...) Don't think so. For fine print on paper there is the (weak) excuse that one wants to save paper. This doesn't exist for the web. The main reason for fine print is of course that people don't won't you to read it, to screw you later if you make (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Screen Resolution Poll —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Nah, that's not true -- font sizes are a good way to denote the relative importance of various bits of text. A legal disclaimer or copyright notice may be important, but conceptually, it's not the focus of the page, so it should be made (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
