Subject:
|
Re: 1950's LEGO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:23:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
370 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Robert M. Dye writes:
>
> Ummm. Why is off topic for off topic fun? Where would general silliness
> regarding LEGO belong?
I think he meant that by discussing lego, you are on-topic for the 'normal'
lugnet groups... some people like to say that the word "lego" is not allowed
in off-topic...
I don't know, but I think that general silliness fits excellently in o-
t.f... :-)
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 1950's LEGO
|
| Ummm. Why is off topic for off topic fun? Where would general silliness regarding LEGO belong? Rob --My best reply address is robdye@writeme.com (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
