Subject:
|
Re: 1950's LEGO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:15:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
358 times
|
| |
|
|
Ummm. Why is off topic for off topic fun? Where would general silliness
regarding LEGO belong?
Rob
--My best reply address is robdye@writeme.com
----------
In article <FrwGrC.CL2@lugnet.com>, "Bram Lambrecht" <BramL@JUNO.com> wrote:
> Lastly, this thread is off-topic for o-t.f!
> --Bram
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: 1950's LEGO
|
| (...) I think he meant that by discussing lego, you are on-topic for the 'normal' lugnet groups... some people like to say that the word "lego" is not allowed in off-topic... I don't know, but I think that general silliness fits excellently in o- (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: 1950's LEGO
|
| (...) Like Shiri said, 'off-topic' means 'not about lego'. Maybe LUGNET needs an .on-topic.fun group... Steve (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 1950's LEGO
|
| (...) I have a Caddy at: (URL) this was just my memory's interpretation of an Eldorado. I didn't use the reference pic shown.) I was also thinking of building an Eldorado or some other car from the fifties in the scale of this muscle car: (URL) this (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
