To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 4195
4194  |  4196
Subject: 
Re: Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:53:32 GMT
Viewed: 
573 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, David Carriker writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
Jeff Stembel wrote:
Not to mention the rooves of buildings.  ;)
Not to mention the roofs...<runnning>  >;-)

hoof -> hooves
roof -> rooves (???)

OR

roof -> roofs
hoof -> hoofs  (???)

Ahhhhhh.....   That's english for ya'  :)

-David

But it *can* be spelled hoofs, as in "huffs" or "hoooffs".  In fact I've seen
it spelled that way more often than the other way.  But I don't like it when
people say "ruffs".

-- Ian

(Incidentally, does anyone here say "tomahto"?) :P



Message is in Reply To:
  Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego)
 
(...) hoof -> hooves roof -> rooves (???) OR roof -> roofs hoof -> hoofs (???) Ahhhhhh..... That's english for ya' :) -David (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

32 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR