To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 4193
4192  |  4194
Subject: 
Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:23:10 GMT
Viewed: 
575 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, John Neal writes:
Jeff Stembel wrote:
Not to mention the rooves of buildings.  ;)
Not to mention the roofs...<runnning>  >;-)

hoof -> hooves
roof -> rooves (???)

OR

roof -> roofs
hoof -> hoofs  (???)

Ahhhhhh.....   That's english for ya'  :)

-David



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego)
 
(...) But it *can* be spelled hoofs, as in "huffs" or "hoooffs". In fact I've seen it spelled that way more often than the other way. But I don't like it when people say "ruffs". -- Ian (Incidentally, does anyone here say "tomahto"?) :P (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Spelling (Re: The Law of Falling Lego)
 
(...) FTR, I made a mistake. I checked the dictionary, and rooves is not a plural form of roof. :) Ahhh... I love English. ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Law of Falling Lego
 
(...) Not to mention the roofs...<runnning> >;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

32 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR