 | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Why the sigh? It says JLUG is not for children and there are no rules. Fine. Now this part I don't get: "The JLUG is a group of Lego enthusiast that are not geographically centred but certainly work together through online communication. After (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | (...) Before my time. Ross is the man to ask about that. I don't particularly care. (...) I never said it was. 'Shenanigans' is just a turn of phrase. He seems quite sincere, and verbose. (...) Me too. And sometimes (not every time as some seem to (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) <snip> Verbose? Who, me?? Dave K -no one around here but us scarecrows... (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) See, Al, at the end of the day, you're just a plain jerk. JOHN (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | (...) I prefer to think of Al as a jerk with the lot. ROSCO (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) You'd know. JOHN (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) LOL, and again you take "I think" and change it to an assertion of knowledge. ROSCO (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: indignant behavior —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | (...) Tut tut, John. That's bordering on incivility. Think of the children reading this. (17 years ago, 26-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) In fact it wasn't all online. (...) It wasn't. And the FAQ doesn't say it was. It says "it started making sense to have a group that could participate online". I see no "need" in that excerpt at all. Just as there was no "need" for the (...) (17 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | (...) You are wrong. I think I would know, since I wrote that, and I was the one joking around. The whole thing started as a joke in real life, because I am geographically challenged from other "local" groups. You know, friends joking... real people (...) (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) It's not shocking, just unclear. Not that it really matters, but these friends with whom you joked-- they aren't AFOLs I assume, because presumabley they are the ones with whom you are geographically challenged. Perhaps you joked with (...) (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: malicious behavior —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | (...) Snipped (...) No, they are AFOLs. Just because I am geographically challenged to them, doesnt mean I didnt actually make the drive (numerous times). Snipped more... (...) Indeed. (...) Exactly (*grins*). Janey "Delusional, Red Brick" (17 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
