 | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | (...) _bumped_ from a flight? You mean, as in, you've payed for a ticket, plane leaves on time, you were there, but there was no room for you because some bigwig payed them bigtime to get in ahead of you? Is that _legal_?! Jasper (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Not only legal, but a completely normal daily business practice. I understand the interest they make on tickets paid for bumped flights is staggering. And that's my conspiracy theory of the day. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) It's not a matter of who paid how much. Airlines overbook. That usually works because not everyone shows up. When they all do, the airlines are required to first ask for volunteers to give up their seats in exchange for a payment of the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | Side note: you can also "fly on stand-by", which means you're the first to go if there isn't enough room. It's cheaper than regular tickets, but I'm not sure by how much. Or if you get less compensation if you are bumped to a later flight. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | (...) Naah.. I think _bumped_from_a_flight means: you're flying over the ocean. Plane hits a speedbump and whoops..there you go. From 15 km hight falling towards the (at that speed rock-hard) water... Mark (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Steven Vore
|
| | | | Yes, see for example this headline from last week's Atlanta Journal/Constitution - "OVERBOOKED: Delta 'denied' 13,449: Atlanta air carrier ranks seventh among U.S. airlines" During the past year(?) they had to turn that many people involuntarily. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Won't happen, I would usually already have volunteered (I volunteer on Fridays but not on Sundays as I have more flexibility at the start). (...) and maybe your load factor was lower... the typical hotel load factor averages in the 60s these (...) (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —Steven Vore
|
| | | | | | (...) have (...) Ah, well... if you've volunteered then they don't count it as a "bump" - though you, the customer, might of course still do so. -- Steven | svore at mindspring .com | kf4fbk | TC++MS++#15LS+M+HalYB64m (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861 —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) This reminded me of my "twilight zone" trip two years ago - driving across the states as a vacation(1) ended up hitting Minneapolis fairly late - tried to get a room and to misuse a quote "there were none to be found" after trying about 8 (...) (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
