Subject:
|
Re: The End of the ISD - An illustrated Star Wars Story
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:44:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1864 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Hey now, are you saying Gungans are "Animals"??? They don't have very good table
> manners (my dog is neater), they're not very bright (my cats are smarter), and
> they are very annoying (a rabid racoon stalking you is less annoying!). But
> still, they're not animals, are they?
>
> I think I am going to contact the ACLU (even though they're not US citizens
> either)...
>
> XFUT lugnet.off-topic.fun
I think this brings up an interesting point. Where do you draw the line between
an 'Animal' and a 'Human' in the SW line? Ewoks and the like, I'd say, are more
like animals, like a cute little terrier, but Gungans... boy, that's a different
story altogether now. I'd say they fall into the low IQ category. Not as dumb as
an animal, yet not as smart as human. Now Yoda, he's a lot more human.
<Random rambling ends here>
Legoswami Samarth
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
