 | | Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | (...) I was really disappointed with it. _LOH_ was so good - their best in my opinion - and _BC_ degraded to a kind of cheezy romance in a SF setting. I guess maybe it was better than that, but only just. The only thing about that book that engaged (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) Cheezy romance is an appropriate description. When the reader was given a play-by-play description of the hero's teen-age daughter's *legs* in running motion, twenty pages into the book, it set a tone that should've rather stayed in the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Yeah! (Duh...) (...) I liked those too. Imaginitive macrofauna is always good. When I was thinking about the book earlier for that post, I didn't recall them at all, just the bees on crystal meth that I thought were kind of boring. (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) With removed <html><i>speed</i></html> glands, if possible. (...) Ever read the short story about the planet "Meatball"? I loved it. Japser (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat —Steven Vore
|
| | | | (...) IMO. (...) <whew> I had the same feeling about these two - first really good, 2nd only fair. I often wonder "am I the only one?" -- Steven | svore at mindspring .com | kf4fbk | TC++MS++#15LS+M+HalYB64m (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
