 | | A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
We're talking life or death, here. (URL) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) And should it be Lugneteer? I can just see the slightly bent minifig names: Acehole, Porthole, Err Amis, and Dark'Tanya. -->But I Like Reese's Pieces<-- (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) Bruce, this is a family-friendly forum. Please take your pottymouth elsewhere. Dave! (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
I rekon its rigged in favour of evil 'smooth' peanut butter .. I demand a recount (when it finishes and if smooth wins of course) -- James Stacey ------ www.minifig.co.uk Lugnet Member #925 I'm a citizen of Legoland travellin' Incommunicado "Bruce (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) Can't go a day without criticizing a poll, eh? :) My personal belief is that it's like the force. You're either good or you're evil :) Adrian (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) Like shooting fish in a barrel. :) But, yes, yes I can. Why, I did't criticise any yesterday, or the day before. I let both of Sean's slide. Hey, I can quit anytime I want. (...) Creamy being good and chunky being evil? or are you a chunky (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | A New Poll (Re: A question of VITAL importance:)
|
|
(...) Please rate the following statement: I believe that Larry can go a day without criticizing a poll. __ I Strongly Agree __ I Somewhat Strongly Agree __ I Somewhat Less Strongly Agree __ I Agree Somewhat Less Strongly Than That __ I Thought That (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A New Poll (Re: A question of VITAL importance:)
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) Take off the ! and I agree with that one Dave K (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) I admit, my inherent bias crept its way into this poll. Since I don't like crunchy peanut butter, I hadn't considered that the others that like creamy (like me) would ALSO like crunchy. Let me tell ya, writing a non-biased poll ain't easy. But (...) (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) You ain't a gambling man, is you, Tex? Ace-in-the-hole (a "down" card that the others can't see). It's your mind that's dirty, not my mouth. :-) -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) Larry... is it time to consider switching to decaf? ;) Allan B. (21 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) It's much easier to find fault than it is to do the work itself. This is true of many things, not just LUGNET(tm) polls. (21 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) Tricky. I think you need to be able to input entire expressions rather than just constrained booleans... My response would have to be: ((sandwich & B1_LETTUCE) && (sandwich & B2_TOMATO)) ? crunchy : smooth but I can't enter that either... (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
