 | | Re: Not quite "fun" but weird
|
|
(...) Now that's the kind of ambiguity of phrase you want to avoid... I'm sure the SO would be none too happy if anyone were to get the impression you were talking about *her* rather than Lydia! Maggie C. (24 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Not quite "fun" but weird
|
|
(...) I have never read a Crichton book so I can't opine, but the only movies based on his work I have ever even liked were "The Andromeda Strain" and "The Great Train Robbery". The latter is just fun -- if only more movies were like that; most (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Not quite "fun" but weird
|
|
(URL) ironic thing is that the only way I'll ever read another Crichton book is if someone ties *me* down. Hmm... Dave! (24 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: The first smiley?
|
|
There was a bit here (URL) here (URL) Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado "Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:sandlin-7DEC1E....net.com... (...) story (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The first smiley?
|
|
(...) used in an advertisement as long ago as the 60s. I'll see if I can find it. (24 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
