 | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | (...) You are hedging the issue. He asked you a simple question, "Which is correct?" (I would add an "and why" to it, though) and you avoid it by saying "One of them." This is not answering his question. As well answer the math teacher's question of (...) (24 years ago, 6-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) No I'm really not son, I broke it down to pure logic. I can even break it down further into truth tables, but I doubt you even know what those are so I won't bother. (...) Actually that isn't what he asked me. Don't you know what a premise is? (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) It's times like this when I wish we could score articles as "Troll" and "Obvious ego autoflagellation" like on Slashdot... :-P Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well, we can't... but we CAN spotlight stuff we agree with. You got my vote on this one, Brother Sproat. ++Lar (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | A washed-out Robert (Was: Robert gets to invalidate logic) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Wow, cool, thanks Brother Lar. Keep the flattery up, you might make a Larritarian out of me yet! ;-) I'm noticing (and I'm sure it's been observed before) that these kind of noisemakers come in cycles, but only last a short time. Burn brightly (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | | | (...) I have not even BEGUN to inflate my ego! I can produce devastating walls of text in my sleep the likes of your puny brain has yet to comprehend! `, Þ Robert (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Even awake for that matter, I suspect, as comprehending gibberish that has no underlying meaning is a bit beyond Sproat's prowess. I've got one of those gibberish generators too, though, so producing text that is incomprehensible isn't much of (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well I suppose if I was doing some social engineering I could stop...but since I'm not that might be a problem. If I was social engineering anyone I would not be so straight forward and blunt in my posts. Robert (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | (...) So why you just don't cut your holly book into two slices, and put your intellect between them and shove it all together to your holly hole, instead just losing your holly time here? If you want to debate, than debate till the end, if you (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | | | (...) I tell ya, seems you guys have absolutely no sense of humor, at all. (...) There be no holly on my intellect! What do I look like, a jolly fat elf with a sack full of presents? Robert (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Indeed it has. You might want to parcel it out a bit cautiously, as it would be a shame to run out of it too soon. ++Lar (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | (...) Heh..heh..heheheh.he...e...heheh. Selçuk (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) I don't know what you're smokin....but I want some! : ) Robert (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | (...) Not smoking anything but Camel, but, just breathing your melodious fart that sounds like "oh my dear lovely and only intellect" maybe? Selçuk PS. Why don't you put your true identity that we are already familiar, Hatter? (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
