 | | Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS") —Ross Crawford
|
| | | (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) Hmmmm. Robert, you're really starting to sound like someone else who came around here temporarily a while back - what was his name? Matthew Boulton? I'd almost forgotten..... ROSCO (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) At this point a general warning should be given that in the near future Robert will likely announce that he has been playing a game with us to see how we'd react. I, for one, feel greatly privileged to have been a part of this bold and (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | | (...) Hmmm again. So, if he's actually _trying_ to come across as a complete failure, and in that, he's a resounding success, which is he? Jason (23 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | | | (...) No matter what the result is, there will always be someone eager to: Misinterpret it. Fake it. Believe it happened according to his own pet theory. Robert (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) No, not really. (...) You make it sound as if I've gone to some great length to hide my identity. A couple weeks ago I posted some links to pictures of some of my models, two new, and one old. So anyone following my work would obviously know (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Just try & cool it Robert. It may sound like that to you, but yours is only one opinion. (...) No, some may have followed your links - that doesn't imply they know who you are. ROSCO (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The play's the thing (was Re: Does God have a name for God have a name for God....) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) I'm tryin to keep things as cool as possible, if any serious debate starts over it I'm not going to get involved, there's no need. To me this group is just a fun place to yammer back and forth over stuff that probably isn't taken too (...) (23 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
