| | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy) Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | (...) I agree. How is that modified by your having committed to do so? (...) What if you're on US business? If your answer is still to let them rot, then I disagree. I also think that there are times when it's simply in the best interest of the (...) (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy) Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, could you restate the question, not following you here. (...) Do you mean US government business? Or just business of a US firm? If the former and it was diplomatic, sure. We have to enforce the rule of law between nations, diplomatic (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy) Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Right, sorry. If you committ to be a keeper in some form, and then the assumed ward reveals moral shortcomings, what's is your behavioral response? (...) I do mean US government business. What if it is as a soldier? -- Sincerely, Christopher (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy) Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Try to fix, then disengage if the (implied) contract becomes null and void. I help my relatives out of respect, admiration, and love. Why do you love someone? Philosophical question... but if I stop respecting my relatives I don't have that (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |