To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 9416
9415  |  9417
Subject: 
Re: Is Bionicle violence?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:09:09 GMT
Viewed: 
29 times
  
So what is worse,
Bugs Bunny looking non-violent but being violent,
or Bionicle looking violent but being non-violent?

I am now reflecting on Power Rangers, and other similar
shows where morphing occurs.  Characters stay in a non-violent
form until it is appropriate to be violent.  You don't use
the super-weapon until it is appropriate to use the super
weapon. Wolverine doesn't *snikt* his claws until it is
appropriate to do so, or aleast no more than 5 minutes before
hand...

-gyug



In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Peter Kanters writes:
In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Bradley Dale writes:
***

To me, the 'weapons' of the Toa seem like tools for getting around in their
environment.  We could have Onua digging tunnels, Gali climbing rocks, and Lewa
cutting his way through dense vegetation.  Tahu's giant flame could help him
see in dark caves.


If you look at the little movies on the small cd-rom`s and the promotion
films on www.bionicle.com you will see that all the toa`s use their
"weapons" as tools to get around



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is Bionicle violence?
 
(...) If you look at the little movies on the small cd-rom`s and the promotion films on www.bionicle.com you will see that all the toa`s use their "weapons" as tools to get around (23 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

12 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR