 | | Re: Why not Both? —Tim Culberson
|
| | | (...) No doubt in my mind. (...) People are a nice meal for lions, and tigers, and bears, and pirannahs, and sharks, and all sorts of carnivores/omnivores, but we seem to be surviving just fine. Perhaps your idea of a Trex isn't what you imagine (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why not Both? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | (...) Then I'm done wasting my time with you. You're hopeless, there's no doubt about it. I refuse to beat my head against a wall to try to talk some real common sense into you. You're just lost, and it's obvious you WANT to be lost. -- Tom Stangl (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Was T-Rex a herbivourous animal?(was: Re: Why not Both?) —Arnold Staniczek
|
| | | | (...) Just because a certain species of primates shows a significant enlargement of brain doesn't mean it always uses it: (...) As long as they can match in speed with their victims it's no problem - or do you want to tell me that the giant (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Was T-Rex a herbivourous animal?(was: Re: Why not Both?) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) It's not the grey matter, it's how the grey matter is wired. The last study I've seen (admittedly only in the mainstream) suggests that it's the brain's ability to cool and warm itself--e.g., the blood flow--that determines a species's (boy, (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
